|


Proving That Z_{mn} is Isomorphic to Z_m X Z_nDate: 04/22/2009 at 14:08:23 From: Jameson Subject: Proving that Zmn isomorphic to Zm X Zn. If m and n are relatively prime, show that Zmn is isomorphic to Zm X Zn. How do you find [x] when transferring between different modulo? Is the group operation of Zm X Zn circle plus or composition? I know the bijective mapping f should be [x](mod mn)|-->([x](mod m), [x](mod n)). Start by letting [x1](mod mn),[x2](mod mn) be in Zmn. Then, f([x1](mod mn) + [x2](mod mn))= f([x1](mod mn)) circle plus f ([x2](mod mn)). I know that eventually this expression should equal f([x1](mod mn)) or f([x2](mod mn)) to prove that they are isomorphic. I've seen several proofs using Chinese Remainder Theorem and Ring theory, but I have learned neither of these. How do you prove this without these two ways?
Date: 04/25/2009 at 03:46:29
From: Doctor Jacques
Subject: Re: Proving that Zmn isomorphic to Zm X Zn.
Hi Jameson,
In fact, this is equivalent to the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT),
although, in this form, the theorem can be generalized to rings other
than Z (using a slightly more general formulation). This means that
any proof must use some ideas of the CRT and/or ring theory. I'll
try to make up a simple explanation.
If m is any non-zero integer, there is a ring homomorphism
g : Z -> Z_m given by g(x) = x (mod m). This is indeed a
homomorphism:
g(x+y) = (x+y) mod m
= x mod m + y mod m
= g(x) + g(y)
and
g(x) = (xy) mod m
= (x mod m) (y mod m)
= g(x)g(y)
In the same way, if n is another non-zero integer, we have a
homomorphism h : Z -> Z_n given by h(x) = x mod n.
Now, we can combine these homomorphisms into a single homomorphism
f : Z -> Z_m X Z_n, by defining:
f(x) = (g(x), h(x))
= (x mod m, x mod n)
The ring operations on Z_m X Z_n are component-wise addition and
multiplication:
(a,b) + (c,d) = (a+b,c+d)
(a,b)(c,d) = (ac,bd)
with a, c in Z_m and b, d in Z_n.
f is also a homomorphism, since:
f(x+y) = (g(x+y), h(x+y))
= (g(x)+g(y), h(x)+h(y))
= (g(x), h(x)) + (g(y), h(y))
= f(x) + f(y)
with a similar result for multiplication.
Note that:
f(x + mn) = ((x + mn) mod m, (x + mn) mod n)
= (x mod m, x mod n)
= f(x)
and this shows that f(x) only depends on (x mod mn); in other words,
we can consider f as a homomorphism from Z_{mn} to Z_m X Z_n.
It remains to show that f is a bijection from Z_{mn} to Z_m X Z_n.
We first show that f is injective (one-to-one). A ring homomorphism f
is injective if and only if f(x) = 0 implies x = 0. Let us assume that:
f(x) = 0 = (0 mod m, 0 mod n)
= (x mod m, x mod n)
This means that:
x = 0 (mod m)
x = 0 (mod n)
The first congruence shows that x is a multiple of m, and the second
one shows that x is a multiple of n. As m and n are relatively prime,
we conclude that x is a multiple of mn, which means that x = 0 in
Z_{mn}. This shows that f is injective.
To show that f is surjective (onto), we must show that, given any two
integers a and b, there exists an integer x such that:
f(x) = (a mod m, b mod n)
which means:
x = a (mod m) [1]
x = b (mod n)
Because m and n are relatively prime, there exist integers u and v
such that:
um + nv = 1 [2]
These integers can be effectively computed using the Extended
Euclidean Algorithm; if you are not familiar with this, you can search
for these terms in our search page:
Search Dr. Math
http://www.mathforum.org/mathgrepform.html
(or anywhere in the Internet). In particular, this article:
Euclid's Extended Algorithm
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/51616.html
gives a practical way of computing u and v (look at the end).
I claim that the integer:
x = anv + bmu [3]
is a solution of the equations [1]. To see this, multiply [2] by a,
this gives:
aum + anv = a
This shows that anv = a (mod m), and, as bmu is obviously a multiple
of m, we have indeed x = a (mod m), and a similar argument shows that
x = b (mod m).
In summary, f is a ring homomorphism between Z_{mn} and Z_m X Z_n, and
that homomorphism is a bijection; it is therefore an isomorphism.
- Doctor Jacques, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
|
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]


Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2010 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/