|


Will Zeller's Rule Work Indefinitely?Date: 04/07/2004 at 00:56:29 From: hunter Subject: Will Zeller's Rule work indefinitely? I showed an equation involving Zeller's Rule to a college teacher and he told me the equation may not work for very distant years. He said that it may be impossible to write an equation relating the day of the week to a given year; month; and day of month because the exact value relating the two may have irrational numbers involved. His statement came as a shock to me; I thought that since the use of the rounding down function is used throughout "Zeller's Rule," the equation would work indefinitely. Who's right? Is the equation sure to work in 4561? Indefinitely?
Date: 04/07/2004 at 09:39:44
From: Doctor Peterson
Subject: Re: Will Zeller's Rule work indefinitely?
Hi, Hunter.
Zeller's formula exactly corresponds to the Gregorian calendar, and
will work as long as that calendar is used. It is true that, over a
very long time, that calendar would need further adjustment, just as
the Julian calendar did; but until a new calendar is defined, you
can't say the formula is wrong! The point is that a calendar is not a
measurement of reality, but a legal concept established by law, and
therefore it remains valid as long as, but ONLY as long as, the law
is in effect. So the formula you have does not refer to the
astronomically measured length of a year, and does not depend on
physical reality for its accuracy; on the other hand, it depends on
the whim of governments, so no one can really say how long it will
remain valid!
A calendar is only a way to fit a whole number of days into each
year, while staying as close as possible to what is, as you were
told, a theoretically irrational number of days per year
astronomically (and also somewhat variable, and subject to errors in
measurement). Therefore no completely regular calendar can be exactly
correct forever; but then, in a sense, no calendar is really exact
anyway, since the whole point is to approximate the year with whole
numbers. It's just that an extra day will have to be added or dropped
eventually. What is surprising is that such a simple set of rules
(and therefore a simple calculation) happens to be able to do such a
good job of approximating the physical length of a year.
Our Calendar FAQ has links to several sites about calendars; here is
one that explains the Gregorian calendar with links to other details,
historical and astronomical:
Gregorian Calendar
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/GregorianCalendar.html
This site summarizes how the rules were changed from the Julian to
the Gregorian calendar, and mentions a proposed additional rule that
would keep it accurate for 20,000 years:
Calendars
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/time/calendars.html
However, the Julian year still differs from the true year of
365.242199 days by 11 minutes and 14 seconds each year, and over
a period of 128 years even the Julian Calendar was in error by
one day with respect to the seasons. By 1582 this error had
accumulated to 10 days and Pope Gregory XIII ordered another
reform: 10 days were dropped from the year 1582, so that October
4, 1582, was followed by October 15, 1582. In addition, to guard
against further accumulation of error, in the new Gregorian
Calendar it was decreed that century years not divisible by 400
were not to be considered leap years. Thus, 1600 was a leap year
but 1700 was not. This made the average length of the year
sufficiently close to the actual year that it would take 3322
years for the error to accumulate to 1 day.
A further modification to the Gregorian Calendar has been
suggested: years evenly divisible by 4000 are not leap years.
This would reduce the error between the Gregorian Calendar Year
and the true year to 1 day in 20,000 years. However, this last
proposed change has not been officially adopted; there is plenty
of time to consider it, since it would not have an effect until
the year 4000.
That is, the length of a year in the Julian calendar was
365 + 1/4 - 1/100 = 365.24
(off by 0.002199 days, or 1 day in 454 years)
and in the Gregorian calendar is
365 + 1/4 - 1/100 + 1/400 = 365.2425
(off by 0.000301, or 1 day in 3322 years)
while with the 4000 year rule it will be
365 + 1/4 - 1/100 + 1/400 - 1/4000 = 365.24225
(off by 0.000051, or 1 day in 19,607 years)
Given that such a simple addition (which has not been made only
because it is not needed yet) would fix the Gregorian calendar so
effectively, we can safely say that you can use Zeller's formula up
to the year 4000. After that--if the change is actually made in law--
you can just add a term to the formula and keep it correct.
If you have any further questions, feel free to write back.
- Doctor Peterson, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
|
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]


Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2011 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/