|


Interpreting Lagrange MultipliersDate: 04/13/2001 at 02:28:15 From: Derek Subject: Lagrange Multiplier I have a question on an assignment and the answer is something I've never come across before, and I don't know its significance: Use Lagrange multipliers to find the maximum and minimum values of the function f(x,y) = 6x^2 + 9y^2 subject to constraint x^2 + y^2 = 1. After calculating the partial derivatives I get lambda = -6 for partial derivative with respect to x and lambda = -9 for partial derivative with respect to y. What does that signify? Does it mean there is no minimum or maximum?
Date: 04/13/2001 at 04:51:06
From: Doctor Mitteldorf
Subject: Re: Lagrange Multiplier
Dear Derek,
First, let's think very concretely about this question. The constraint
x^2 + y^2 = 1 says "look only at points on the unit circle." The
function 6x^2 + 9y^2 gets larger as you go away from the origin, but
it gets larger fastest in the +y or -y directions, and slowest in the
x directions. So without any fancy Lagrange methods, we know right
away what the answer is: maxima at (0,1) and (0,-1); minima at (1,0)
and (-1,0).
Now let's go back and see how to get this answer using the Lagrange
method: The differential of the function f(x,y) = 6x^2 + 9y^2 can be
written df = (12x)dx + (18y)dy. We must compare this to the
differential of the constraint g(x) = x^2 + y^2; dg = (2x)dx + (2y)dy.
Think of dx as the unit vector in the x direction and dy as the unit
vector in the y direction. The essence of the Lagrange method is to
say that the two vectors df and dg must point in the same direction,
i.e., that df + lambda * dg = 0. The equation reduces to:
(12x + lambda*2x) dx + (18y + lambda*2y) dy = 0
This equation needs to be identically true, that is, the dx part and
the dy part must separately be equal to zero. The only way to make
this happen is for lambda to be -6 while y = 0, or lambda to be -9
while x = 0. These conditions lead us to the four answers that we know
are correct.
I think you went astray when you divided through by x, implicitly
assuming that x was not 0 (and the same for y).
- Doctor Mitteldorf, The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
|
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]


Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2011 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/