|


Nested Sums
Date: 6/17/96 at 22:45:20
From: Anonymous
Subject: Nested sums
infinity 1 infinity 1
Given SUM --- = p and SUM --- = q
j = 1 j^3 k = 1 k^2
Then evaluate
infinity infinity 1
SUM SUM --------
j = 1 k = 1 (j + k)^3
in terms of p and q.
Thanks,
-Michael
Date: 6/18/96 at 6:36:28
From: Doctor Pete
Subject: Re: Nested sums
This was a really fun and interesting problem - thanks! :)
I'll call your values p and q by their more common name, zeta(3) and
zeta(2); these are particular values of the zeta function, which is
defined as
oo
\---\ 1
zeta(z) = > --- = Sum[1/k^z, {k,1,Infinity}].
/---/ k^z
k=1
To simplify typing, I will use the latter notation for a sum.
(Incidentally, this is the way sums are expressed in Mathematica.)
Then our problem is to find
S = Sum[Sum[1/(k+j)^3, {k,1,Infinity}], {j,1,Infinity}]
in terms of zeta(2) and zeta(3). Take the inside sum for a particular
value of j (that is, think of j as being fixed). Then we have
Sum[1/(k+j)^3, {k,1,Infinity}]
= - Sum[1/k^3, {k,1,j}] + Sum[1/k^3, {k,1,Infinity}]
= - Sum[1/k^3, {k,1,j}] + zeta(3).
So
S = Sum[-Sum[1/k^3, {k,1,j}]+zeta(3), {j,1,Infinity}].
Now, to evaluate this, we must think of the sum as a limit of a finite
sum; that is,
Sum[f(j), {j,1,Infinity}] = Lim[Sum[f(j), {j,1,N}],
N->Infinity].
Therefore
S = Lim[Sum[-Sum[1/k^3, {k,1,j}]+zeta(3), {j,1,N}], N->Infinity]
= Lim[N*zeta(3)-Sum[Sum[1/k^3, {k,1,j}], {j,1,N}], N->Infinity].
But note that this double sum can be re-expressed, since
Sum[Sum[1/k^3, {k,1,j}], {j,1,N}]
= 1/1^3
+ 1/1^3 + 1/2^3
+ 1/1^3 + 1/2^3 + 1/3^3
.
.
.
+ 1/1^3 + 1/2^3 + 1/3^3 + ... + 1/N^3
-------------------------------------------
= N/1^3 + (N-1)/2^3 + (N-2)/3^3 + ... + 1/N^3
= Sum[(N+1-j)/j^3, {j,1,N}]
= Sum[(N+1)/j^3-1/j^2, {j,1,N}]
= (N+1)Sum[1/j^3, {j,1,N}] + Sum[1/j^2, {j,1,N}].
Hence
S = Lim[N*zeta(3)-(N+1)*Sum[1/j^3, {j,1,N}] + Sum[1/j^2, {j,1,N}]
N->Infinity]
= -zeta(3)+zeta(2).
Another interesting problem is to show that zeta(2) = Pi^2/6. There
is a general formula for zeta(2n) for positive integer n in terms of
Bernoulli numbers, but no similar expression has been found for odd
values.
Your above sum is approximately 0.442877165.
To be completely rigorous, however, one needs to show convergence
under the transformations and rearrangements in the above solution;
since this is probably not the intended purpose of the problem, I will
not make these arguments.
If the notation I've described above is unclear, I might suggest you
look at the following URL:
http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~peterw/studies/bernoulli/
-Doctor Pete, The Math Forum
Check out our web site! http://mathforum.org/dr.math/
|
Search the Dr. Math Library: |
[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]


Ask Dr. MathTM
© 1994-2011 The Math Forum
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/